Tripartite Joint Venture Agreement

Control party: with respect to patents or patent applications that claim intellectual property jointly developed by two or more contracting parties: a) Genentech (or Novartis, if Genentech is not co-owner of the applicable patent or patent application), only with respect to the United States; b) Novartis (or Genentech, if Novartis is not a co-owner of the applicable patent or patent application), with regard to Europe; c) Novartis (or Tanox, if Novartis is not a co-owner of the applicable patent or patent application) for East Asia and the rest of the world. The main objective of the tripartite agreement is to provide financial support to the lender/borrower, i.e. the bank, for the holding of a property on a construction site. A joint enterprise agreement should contain the names of the signatories, the terms and purpose of the agreement, as well as any additional information on the project implemented. A joint venture agreement could also include clauses regarding the disclosure of sensitive information, termination and the duration of the business. If you are thinking about making one of these agreements, you should know. The revised and reinstated LD agreement is the amended and amended development and licensing agreement reached by Tanox and Novartis at the time of this agreement (an exact and accurate copy of this agreement was presented to Genentech on the reference date of this agreement), which amended and confirmed the original D-L agreement and parts of the supplementary agreement; in any event, which relates to certain products that have entered into a non-igE product agreement, this agreement may be amended from time to time, as is permitted in section 2.5 above. 2.2 In addition to the L-L agreement, the JCA and the cross-licensing agreement . This agreement, as well as the exhibits and annexes, are drawn up by the contracting parties in addition to the complementary agreement, the LD agreement and the cross-licence agreement (the agreements, as amended and amended, remain fully in force).

In the event of contradictions between the terms of this agreement and LuB`s ancillary agreement, the amended and reinstated D-L agreement, the cross-licensing agreement or the JCA, the provisions of this agreement are given priority with regard to the development, manufacture or marketing (since these conditions must be interpreted in general and are not defined as strictly defined in this contract) of anti-IgE antibodies and anti-IgE products; provided, however, that (a) that, as only between Novartis and Genentech, to the extent that this agreement remains silent on an issue expressly addressed by the ACJ, the provisions of the PAC (including, but not limited, to all references to the survival of the original ACF provisions) be given priority; and b) as only between Novartis and Tanox, by remaining silent on an issue explicitly addressed under the complementary agreement, priority is given to LuB`s ancillary agreement. (ii) With regard to an anti-IgE patent that is not: -, any measure to enforce or defend this anti-IgE patent must be approved by the owner (or, if necessary, by all co-owners) of this anti-IgE patent. The owner meets with the other contracting parties to discuss and consider in good faith any action to enforce or defend such an anti-IgE patent; the contracting parties take over with respect to the purpose of this case and, unless otherwise, all previous agreements reached by the parties with respect to that purpose.